H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Marcelo Rios H2H: 3-4

Marcelo Rios holds a 4–3 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2002 Australian Open quarterfinal 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 25, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Tommy Haas #9 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(5) Marcelo Rios #48 Match data
May 31, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Tommy Haas #21 6-3 6-2 (ret.) Marcelo Rios #19 Match data
May 9, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Marcelo Rios #8 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #20 Match data
Oct 29, 1998* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marcelo Rios #2 6-3 7-5 Tommy Haas #37 Match data
Oct 24, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 SF Carpet Tommy Haas #53 6-2 1-0 (ret.) Marcelo Rios #2 Match data
Mar 19, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marcelo Rios #3 6-4 6-3 Tommy Haas #34 Match data
Aug 31, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marcelo Rios #10 6-4 3-6 6-3 1-6 6-1 Tommy Haas #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Marcelo Rios
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16
25 — — — — — — — 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —