H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Milos Raonic H2H: 0-3

Milos Raonic holds a 3–0 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2017 Rome Masters third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2017* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Milos Raonic #6 6-4 6-3 Tommy Haas #386 Match data
Jul 2, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Milos Raonic #8 6-0 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(4) Tommy Haas #861 Match data
Feb 17, 2013* San Jose ATP 250 F Hard Milos Raonic #13 6-4 6-3 Tommy Haas #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 — — — — — — — 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —