H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 1-1

Tommy Haas and Mischa Zverev are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2017 Stuttgart Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mischa Zverev
GER Age 39 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mischa Zverev #31 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #302 Match data Jun 17, 2017* QF Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Grass
Tommy Haas #41 7-6(5) 6-2 Mischa Zverev #45 Match data Jun 13, 2009* QF Halle Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Mischa Zverev #1,373 #25 1,664 2,007 134 199 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Mischa Zverev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 2006 3–3 50.0% #151 1,529 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2007 6–8 42.9% #88 1,606 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2008 18–23 43.9% #80 1,710 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2009 15–24 38.5% #78 1,630 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2010 14–18 43.8% #82 1,675 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2011 2–18 10.0% #211 1,494 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2012 0–3 0.0% #159 1,608 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2013 4–5 44.4% #176 1,638 0 0
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2015 7–8 46.7% #171 1,840 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2016 12–14 46.2% #51 1,916 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2017 30–31 49.2% #33 1,850 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2018 19–29 39.6% #69 1,685 0 1
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2019 3–12 20.0% #281 1,572 0 1
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2020 1–2 33.3% #264 1,568 0 1
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2021 0–1 0.0% #346 1,522 0 1
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Mischa Zverev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2008 12 12 24 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 6 14 20 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 11 11 22 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2011 1 8 9 11.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2015 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2016 11 10 21 52.4% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2017 18 19 37 48.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2018 7 18 25 28.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2019 1 4 5 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 79 114 193 40.9% 25 54 79 31.6% 30 30 60 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 328/333 of Mischa Zverev's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Mischa Zverev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 2006 6/6 6.8 1.3 70.7% 71.2% 46.2% 58.2% 49.7% 63.9% 31.9%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 2007 14/14 5.1 2.1 61.6% 67.2% 50.3% 58.5% 37.5% 61.1% 37.3%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2008 37/41 4.6 1.4 66.7% 68.6% 50.2% 58.3% 36.2% 62.2% 35.2%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2009 39/39 4.5 1.9 63.4% 68.0% 49.5% 64.7% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2010 31/32 3.5 2.2 66.3% 66.5% 46.8% 50.4% 38.5% 59.6% 35.1%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2011 20/20 2.0 1.8 64.3% 60.1% 46.8% 53.8% 42.6% 55.3% 33.2%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2012 3/3 6.3 3.7 58.7% 62.8% 44.1% 52.4% 34.5% 55.2% 35.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 9/9 3.7 2.8 67.3% 64.3% 42.0% 41.6% 38.3% 57.1% 35.7%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2015 15/15 7.1 1.8 67.5% 68.9% 50.7% 63.6% 34.2% 63.4% 34.5%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2016 26/26 5.2 2.0 64.7% 73.1% 52.8% 59.2% 43.3% 65.8% 38.1%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2017 61/61 6.4 2.7 65.2% 71.5% 50.5% 62.7% 45.4% 64.1% 33.9%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2018 48/48 5.5 2.4 59.6% 71.3% 49.0% 57.0% 35.0% 62.2% 36.2%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2019 15/15 4.3 2.7 64.4% 64.1% 43.7% 58.5% 27.5% 57.0% 28.0%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2020 3/3 2.0 2.7 62.3% 68.9% 51.4% 55.0% 33.5% 62.4% 33.2%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2021 1/1 5.0 2.0 57.1% 63.5% 43.6% 50.0% 44.4% 54.9% 38.8%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 328/333 5.0 2.2 64.3% 68.7% 49.0% 58.4% 39.5% 61.7% 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Mischa Zverev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 2006 1530 115.8 +0.34 -1.37 0.883 47.7% +10 — — 53.3% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 102.6 +0.06
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 105.9 +0.37 2007 1607 116.8 -1.19 -0.21 0.960 49.3% -7 — +18 38.9% -0.53 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.28
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) 107.9 -2.69 2008 1710 130.6 -0.67 -1.51 0.931 48.5% +11 -218 -40 48.4% -0.28 5–9 (36%) 6–11 (35%) 95.4 -0.70
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 104.0 +0.33 2009 1631 136.9 -1.54 -0.05 0.938 49.1% -40 -24 +85 42.9% -0.23 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 96.5 -1.09
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) 107.0 -0.61 2010 1676 123.2 -3.33 -0.90 0.868 47.4% +17 -183 +32 40.6% -0.93 5–2 (71%) 9–3 (75%) 109.2 +0.75
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) 104.3 -1.10 2011 1494 114.1 -4.27 -2.53 0.741 44.2% +80 -81 +114 18.4% -2.12 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 -0.49
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) 108.9 +1.60 2012 1608 128.0 -1.03 -1.71 0.801 46.0% — — — 22.2% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.34
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1639 122.4 -3.28 -0.27 0.834 46.7% +34 — +13 42.9% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 101.9 +0.46
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 103.2 -2.50 2014 1561 110.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) 97.9 +0.64 2015 1840 138.3 -0.20 +0.40 0.943 48.8% -46 — -30 45.9% -0.19 4–3 (57%) 8–8 (50%) 103.7 -1.92
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) 102.2 +0.81 2016 1916 147.9 +1.33 +2.10 1.114 51.4% +45 -348 — 50.8% +0.49 2–6 (25%) 5–11 (31%) 93.6 +0.12
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) 100.3 +2.11 2017 1851 155.7 +0.36 -1.01 0.943 49.0% +5 -186 -5 49.4% -0.13 12–8 (60%) 11–16 (41%) 101.5 -2.26
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 97.2 -0.96 2018 1686 141.4 -1.71 -0.03 0.956 48.9% -37 +19 +171 45.7% -0.27 5–11 (31%) 7–10 (41%) 92.2 +0.05
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) 105.4 -1.53 2019 1572 115.7 -3.93 -5.33 0.650 43.0% +27 +27 +220 12.9% -2.61 — 1–1 — +0.08
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2020 1569 116.2 -1.52 +0.52 0.884 47.5% +30 — — 33.3% -0.33 — 0–1 — -0.12
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) 96.4 +1.11 2021 1522 101.7 -1.33 +1.31 0.862 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.11
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 106.0 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) 104.9 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) 107.1 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 96.1 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 99.8 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2007 139.5 -1.26 -0.72 0.912 48.3% +4 -113 +63 42.8% -0.48 49–59 (45%) 64–79 (45%) 96.9 -1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.