H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Richard Fromberg H2H: 1-0

Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 64 6-7(4) 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #16 6-7(4) 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-2 Richard Fromberg #73 Match data Jun 25, 1999* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 283 46.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Richard Fromberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,663 0 2
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1992 14–23 37.8% #83 1,636 0 3
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,681 0 3
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,697 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,671 0 3
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,673 0 4
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,597 0 4
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,632 0 4
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Richard Fromberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1993 14 12 26 53.8% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 17 15 32 53.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 11 8 19 57.9% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 103 113 216 47.7% 123 124 247 49.8% 15 21 36 41.7% 6 25 31 19.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 393/450 of Richard Fromberg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Richard Fromberg
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1991 29/38 5.1 2.9 56.9% 70.5% 47.5% 54.4% 46.4% 60.8% 41.7%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 1992 33/37 6.2 3.6 55.9% 70.4% 47.0% 62.4% 39.8% 60.1% 38.1%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1993 54/64 8.5 3.9 58.0% 73.3% 48.4% 60.4% 40.6% 62.8% 34.6%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1994 49/53 8.7 4.6 58.9% 73.2% 49.4% 57.8% 42.1% 63.4% 35.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 33/38 7.2 2.8 56.7% 72.8% 49.6% 60.0% 42.5% 62.9% 36.5%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 1996 34/39 7.7 3.0 59.8% 74.6% 48.7% 47.3% 42.4% 64.1% 38.0%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 1997 40/44 8.7 5.1 59.9% 75.9% 47.1% 58.1% 38.3% 64.5% 36.3%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 1998 50/57 11.1 3.6 59.7% 76.6% 49.0% 60.6% 41.3% 65.5% 37.5%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 1999 26/31 11.0 3.9 59.1% 72.8% 49.8% 61.0% 30.5% 63.2% 34.0%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2000 34/38 9.8 3.4 59.6% 72.4% 50.7% 51.9% 49.1% 63.8% 36.9%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2001 9/9 8.0 3.6 58.5% 69.4% 41.2% 45.9% 44.8% 57.6% 32.7%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2002 2/2 4.0 6.0 60.9% 71.8% 34.2% 47.7% 22.5% 57.0% 33.6%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 393/530 8.5 3.8 58.6% 73.4% 48.5% 57.4% 41.4% 63.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Richard Fromberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 1988 1551 111.4 — — — — +19 — — 46.4% -0.46 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.29
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 1989 1548 118.1 — — — — +34 — — 36.0% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.22
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 1990 1663 138.3 — — — — -70 +70 -25 55.7% +0.45 11–12 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.40
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 1991 1643 133.9 +0.28 +1.30 1.064 51.0% +14 +47 — 48.4% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.91
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 1992 1637 132.1 -0.58 -0.50 0.954 49.4% +19 +5 — 44.1% -0.28 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.04
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 1993 1682 133.8 +1.16 -2.63 0.932 49.1% +27 -9 -121 50.3% +0.05 15–9 (63%) 21–19 (53%) — +0.53
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 1994 1698 136.2 +1.93 -2.65 0.970 49.9% -30 +46 -86 47.6% -0.14 10–10 (50%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.37
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1672 142.3 +1.50 -1.49 0.983 49.6% -41 +85 — 49.4% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.88
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 1996 1633 136.1 +2.11 -0.57 1.060 50.8% +20 +51 — 47.4% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.93
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 1997 1674 134.6 +2.54 -1.42 1.022 50.5% -72 +76 -91 44.2% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–17 (35%) — -1.35
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 1998 1598 134.8 +3.39 -0.75 1.089 51.6% -4 +127 -33 47.4% +0.18 10–14 (42%) 8–24 (25%) — +1.54
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 1999 1667 126.4 +1.31 -2.30 0.922 49.0% -31 +33 -90 49.4% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.28
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2000 1633 131.8 +1.64 -0.83 1.022 50.3% +93 -40 -74 49.1% +0.05 9–11 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2001 1502 115.9 -0.76 -1.82 0.772 45.4% +142 +20 — 18.2% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.43
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2002 1486 104.4 +0.20 -1.39 0.783 45.5% — — — 28.6% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.18
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1823 139.4 +1.58 -1.32 0.994 50.0% +3 +49 -67 47.5% -0.08 92–106 (46%) 124–143 (46%) 97.7 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.