H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 8-1

Tommy Haas holds a 8–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 5–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2004 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8 1
9 main draw meetings
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2004* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Tommy Haas #882 6-4 3-6 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #64 Match data
Sep 1, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tommy Haas #3 6-4 3-6 3-6 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #29 Match data
Oct 13, 2001* Vienna ATP 250 SF Hard Tommy Haas #16 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4) Thomas Enqvist #30 Match data
Oct 5, 2001* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tommy Haas #17 7-5 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #30 Match data
May 6, 2000* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Tommy Haas #19 7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Oct 2, 1999* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals SF Hard Tommy Haas #11 6-3 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #17 Match data
Sep 1, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tommy Haas #14 6-2 6-4 7-6(6) Thomas Enqvist #19 Match data
Oct 18, 1997* Lyon ATP 250 QF Carpet Tommy Haas #67 6-3 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #17 Match data
Jul 31, 1997* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #8 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15