H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 8-1
Tommy Haas holds a 8–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 5–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2004 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8
–
1
9 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-4 3-6 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2001* | Vienna | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4) | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2001* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-2 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| May 6, 2000* | Munich | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Tommy Haas | 7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1999* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | SF | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-2 6-4 7-6(6) | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1997* | Lyon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1997* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Haas | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 |
| 31 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 |
| 32 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |