H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tommy Paul vs Rogerio Dutra Silva.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Paul | 6-2 6-3 | Rogerio Dutra Silva | Match data | Mar 24, 2016* | Q2 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Paul | #21 | #8 | 3,510 | 2,047 | 235 | 151 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,747 | 24 | 60 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Paul | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #43 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #12 | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,952 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #21 | 1,947 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #98 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tommy Paul | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 27 | 16 | 43 | 62.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 31 | 15 | 46 | 67.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 157 | 100 | 257 | 61.1% | 47 | 35 | 82 | 57.3% | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | — | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 16 | 38 | 54 | 29.6% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/387 of Tommy Paul's and 82/84 of Rogerio Dutra Silva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tommy Paul | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 60.2% | 54.7% | 34.3% | 38.5% | 42.9% | 46.6% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 5/5 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 58.3% | 68.8% | 47.1% | 50.2% | 53.0% | 59.4% | 36.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 10/10 | 5.8 | 2.9 | 65.1% | 69.9% | 54.7% | 64.2% | 33.0% | 64.4% | 34.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 64.1% | 71.2% | 50.8% | 69.5% | 30.0% | 64.3% | 33.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 6/6 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 61.7% | 70.0% | 58.9% | 54.4% | 48.0% | 65.5% | 39.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 27/27 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 59.6% | 70.3% | 53.9% | 58.9% | 40.6% | 63.5% | 36.8% | 2007 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 53.6% | 60.0% | 38.5% | 33.3% | — | 50.0% | 29.2% |
| 24 | 2021 | 47/48 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 60.1% | 70.7% | 52.3% | 54.2% | 41.2% | 63.4% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 62/62 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 62.0% | 71.3% | 51.7% | 58.9% | 40.8% | 63.8% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 65/65 | 6.8 | 2.5 | 61.8% | 73.0% | 54.5% | 60.0% | 39.5% | 65.7% | 38.6% | 2010 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 82.7% | 64.2% | 58.8% | 40.0% | 33.3% | 63.3% | 33.7% |
| 27 | 2024 | 60/64 | 5.7 | 1.8 | 60.9% | 72.6% | 57.1% | 64.3% | 45.4% | 66.4% | 40.9% | 2011 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 53.4% | 71.0% | 51.1% | 66.9% | 38.3% | 62.2% | 35.1% |
| 28 | 2025 | 42/43 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 60.0% | 72.9% | 52.9% | 56.8% | 46.9% | 65.0% | 40.0% | 2012 | 9/9 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 64.3% | 68.7% | 49.8% | 57.6% | 32.8% | 61.6% | 33.8% |
| 29 | 2026 | 51/52 | 6.9 | 1.9 | 62.3% | 75.1% | 55.0% | 55.4% | 46.4% | 67.7% | 38.7% | 2013 | 7/7 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 61.6% | 61.5% | 43.2% | 39.4% | 31.5% | 54.7% | 29.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 65.7% | 58.8% | 50.0% | 40.0% | 68.8% | 55.8% | 34.5% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 55.5% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 53.5% | 60.5% | 49.9% | 40.3% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8/10 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 56.2% | 68.4% | 48.4% | 55.7% | 34.9% | 59.0% | 30.6% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 31/31 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 58.0% | 67.5% | 48.6% | 54.7% | 31.0% | 59.6% | 36.9% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16/16 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 65.3% | 69.6% | 49.9% | 56.0% | 43.2% | 62.5% | 36.5% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 55.9% | 63.2% | 46.7% | 76.9% | 16.7% | 55.9% | 33.3% |
| Career | — | 380/387 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 61.2% | 72.2% | 53.9% | 58.7% | 42.7% | 65.1% | 38.7% | — | 82/84 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 60.4% | 66.9% | 48.4% | 54.0% | 35.8% | 59.4% | 35.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tommy Paul | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1549 | 112.2 | +0.36 | -0.93 | 0.677 | 41.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | — | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1550 | 112.9 | -2.24 | -2.49 | 0.891 | 48.2% | +28 | — | — | 38.5% | -0.62 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 1666 | 136.2 | -0.82 | -0.05 | 0.956 | 49.5% | +20 | — | — | 52.0% | -0.12 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1693 | 114.1 | -0.42 | -1.13 | 0.944 | 49.2% | +1 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.22 | 1–0 | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 1708 | 124.2 | +0.28 | +1.31 | 1.154 | 52.2% | +17 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.07 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 1780 | 144.9 | -0.08 | +0.21 | 1.008 | 50.2% | +4 | -149 | — | 52.0% | +0.01 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | -0.16 | 2007 | 1463 | 94.8 | -1.48 | -4.09 | 0.583 | 40.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.29 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1919 | 148.6 | +0.61 | +1.88 | 1.044 | 50.5% | -23 | -179 | — | 49.2% | -0.05 | 10–5 (67%) | 8–10 (44%) | — | -1.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 1936 | 157.6 | +0.82 | +2.57 | 1.060 | 51.0% | +27 | -275 | -133 | 54.8% | +0.39 | 13–10 (57%) | 13–14 (48%) | — | -2.63 | 2009 | 1435 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 1911 | 156.0 | +2.21 | +2.81 | 1.127 | 51.8% | +61 | -278 | -69 | 58.0% | +0.61 | 13–10 (57%) | 16–16 (50%) | — | +1.25 | 2010 | 1480 | 108.6 | -0.10 | -2.44 | 0.918 | 49.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1974 | 159.9 | +2.31 | +4.62 | 1.216 | 53.5% | -26 | -139 | +59 | 66.9% | +1.06 | 9–8 (53%) | 14–9 (61%) | — | +1.38 | 2011 | 1561 | 112.4 | +1.25 | -1.51 | 0.929 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1953 | 152.5 | +1.31 | +3.47 | 1.140 | 52.3% | -43 | +31 | -1 | 62.4% | +0.90 | 11–6 (65%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | +1.10 | 2012 | 1644 | 123.2 | -0.62 | -1.07 | 0.880 | 48.0% | — | +34 | — | 31.8% | -1.41 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.12 |
| 29 | 2026 | 1948 | 153.2 | +2.85 | +2.81 | 1.198 | 52.8% | -6 | +39 | -9 | 63.8% | +0.91 | 13–9 (59%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | +0.99 | 2013 | 1646 | 116.5 | -2.88 | -1.49 | 0.651 | 42.3% | — | -23 | — | 19.0% | -2.48 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.16 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1619 | 111.5 | +1.18 | -2.88 | 0.780 | 45.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1680 | 117.9 | -2.84 | -1.67 | 0.806 | 45.2% | — | +52 | — | 14.3% | -1.86 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1608 | 121.3 | -1.33 | -2.43 | 0.748 | 45.5% | +31 | +32 | — | 26.9% | -1.46 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.67 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1609 | 130.1 | -3.20 | +0.15 | 0.915 | 48.1% | +16 | +53 | — | 36.6% | -0.80 | 6–5 (55%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | +1.10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1710 | 136.4 | -1.51 | +0.05 | 0.971 | 49.3% | -71 | +61 | — | 40.0% | -0.48 | 0–6 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.46 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1639 | 109.5 | +0.91 | -0.48 | 0.756 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| Career | — | 2047 | 156.1 | +1.42 | +2.61 | 1.108 | 51.7% | +6 | -107 | -36 | 57.8% | +0.54 | 78–61 (56%) | 86–88 (49%) | 100.5 | +0.03 | — | 1748 | 127.8 | -1.99 | -0.69 | 0.865 | 47.3% | +5 | +45 | — | 31.9% | -1.15 | 10–17 (37%) | 16–12 (57%) | 100.2 | +0.27 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Cerundolo | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Carlos Alcaraz | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Alex de Minaur | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 22, 2026 | H2H |
| Sebastian Korda | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 22, 2026 | H2H |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | 4 | 3 | 7 | May 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 14, 2019 | H2H |
| Horacio Zeballos | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 3, 2018 | H2H |
| Alessandro Giannessi | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 29, 2018 | H2H |
| Radu Albot | 2 | 0 | 2 | May 3, 2018 | H2H |