H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:17 UTC
Tommy Paul vs Tomas Machac H2H: 1-3
Tomas Machac holds a 3–1 lead over Tommy Paul in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Machac leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Tommy Paul leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Machac won the 2026 Adelaide International semifinal 2-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 25
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | Adelaide International | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Tomas Machac | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Tommy Paul | Match data |
| May 12, 2025* | Internazionali BNL d'Italia | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Tommy Paul | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | Tomas Machac | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2024* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Machac | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Tommy Paul | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2024* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Machac | 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Tommy Paul | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Paul | #24 | #8 | 3,510 | 2,044 | 227 | 146 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Tomas Machac | #53 | #20 | 2,330 | 1,989 | 75 | 63 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Paul | Tomas Machac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #25 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,925 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,967 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #24 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |