H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Albert Montanes H2H: 6-0

Tommy Robredo holds a 6–0 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 4–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2013 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2013* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #19 6-4 6-1 Albert Montanes #58 Match data
Oct 12, 2010* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #43 6-3 7-6(4) Albert Montanes #23 Match data
Apr 17, 2008* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #18 6-3 7-5 Albert Montanes #59 Match data
May 2, 2007* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #7 6-4 6-3 Albert Montanes #57 Match data
Sep 30, 2005* Palermo ATP 250 R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #17 7-5 6-2 Albert Montanes #69 Match data
May 3, 2001* Mallorca ATP 250 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #83 6-0 6-2 Albert Montanes #127 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,920 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Albert Montanes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,678 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,553 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,529 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,816 0 3
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,868 0 5
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,741 0 6
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —