H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Henri Laaksonen
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tommy Robredo vs Henri Laaksonen.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Robredo | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |