H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 4-4

Tommy Robredo and Jurgen Melzer are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2010 Dubai fourth round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 25, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Jurgen Melzer #31 6-3 7-5 Tommy Robredo #23 Match data
Jan 15, 2009* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #22 6-3 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #32 Match data
Jan 18, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #6 6-1 6-3 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #32 Match data
Jul 27, 2006* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #81 6-2 7-5 Tommy Robredo #7 Match data
Jan 5, 2006* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #19 7-5 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #52 Match data
Nov 4, 2004* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Jurgen Melzer #43 6-3 3-6 6-1 Tommy Robredo #12 Match data
Oct 9, 2003* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Jurgen Melzer #79 6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(3) Tommy Robredo #18 Match data
Oct 2, 2003* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #18 6-2 7-6(5) Jurgen Melzer #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —