H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 3-0

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2006 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #19 6-1 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #110 Match data
Jan 9, 2004* Chennai ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Robredo #21 6-2 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #108 Match data
Jun 20, 2003* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Tommy Robredo #21 6-4 2-6 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Kenneth Carlsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —