H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 2-0
Tommy Robredo holds a 2–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2010 Bastad third round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2010* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2008* | Warsaw | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 7-5 6-2 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tommy Robredo | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |