H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Milos Raonic H2H: 0-6

Milos Raonic holds a 6–0 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 3–0 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2016 Australian Open second round 7-6(6) 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main draw meetings
Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 21, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Milos Raonic #14 7-6(6) 7-6(5) 7-5 Tommy Robredo #42 Match data
Sep 26, 2015* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Hard Milos Raonic #9 6-1 6-2 Tommy Robredo #27 Match data
Apr 17, 2015* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Milos Raonic #6 6-3 3-6 6-3 Tommy Robredo #20 Match data
Mar 19, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Milos Raonic #6 6-3 6-2 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data
Apr 18, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Milos Raonic #10 6-4 6-3 Tommy Robredo #18 Match data
Apr 27, 2013* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay Milos Raonic #13 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(2) Tommy Robredo #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —