H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 3-1

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–1 lead over Mischa Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2011 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-3 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mischa Zverev
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 13, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #28 6-3 3-6 7-5 Mischa Zverev #102 Match data
Feb 19, 2010* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Mischa Zverev #92 6-2 3-6 6-1 Tommy Robredo #17 Match data
Aug 27, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tommy Robredo #15 7-6(4) 6-2 6-1 Mischa Zverev #94 Match data
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tommy Robredo #12 4-6 2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 7-5 Mischa Zverev #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Mischa Zverev #1,373 #25 1,664 2,007 134 199 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Mischa Zverev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2006 3–3 50.0% #151 1,528 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2007 6–8 42.9% #88 1,606 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2008 18–23 43.9% #80 1,703 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2009 15–24 38.5% #78 1,630 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2010 14–18 43.8% #82 1,689 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2011 2–18 10.0% #211 1,498 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2012 0–3 0.0% #159 1,608 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2013 4–5 44.4% #176 1,639 0 0
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2015 7–8 46.7% #171 1,839 0 0
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2016 12–14 46.2% #51 1,917 0 0
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2017 30–31 49.2% #33 1,850 0 0
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2018 19–29 39.6% #69 1,686 0 1
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2019 3–12 20.0% #281 1,571 0 1
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2020 1–2 33.3% #264 1,568 0 1
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2021 0–1 0.0% #346 1,521 0 1
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —