Uladzimir Ignatik
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florent Serra | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 13, 2008 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Uladzimir Ignatik vs Mischa Zverev.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mischa Zverev | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | Uladzimir Ignatik | Match data | Aug 26, 2013 | Q1 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uladzimir Ignatik | #1,379 | #129 | 424 | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Uladzimir Ignatik | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,916 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Uladzimir Ignatik | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1497 | 105.8 | -0.04 | -3.06 | 0.635 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1530 | 115.8 | +0.34 | -1.37 | 0.883 | 47.7% | +10 | — | — | 53.3% | -0.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.6 | +0.06 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1491 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1607 | 116.8 | -1.19 | -0.21 | 0.960 | 49.3% | -7 | — | +18 | 38.9% | -0.53 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.6 | -0.28 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1487 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1710 | 130.6 | -0.67 | -1.51 | 0.931 | 48.5% | +11 | -218 | -40 | 48.4% | -0.28 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–11 (35%) | 95.4 | -0.70 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1458 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1631 | 136.9 | -1.54 | -0.05 | 0.938 | 49.1% | -40 | -24 | +85 | 42.9% | -0.23 | 9–9 (50%) | 5–9 (36%) | 96.5 | -1.09 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1419 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1676 | 123.2 | -3.33 | -0.90 | 0.868 | 47.4% | +17 | -183 | +32 | 40.6% | -0.93 | 5–2 (71%) | 9–3 (75%) | 109.2 | +0.75 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1427 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1494 | 114.1 | -4.27 | -2.53 | 0.741 | 44.2% | +80 | -81 | +114 | 18.4% | -2.12 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.7 | -0.49 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1455 | 114.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1608 | 128.0 | -1.03 | -1.71 | 0.801 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.34 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1441 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1639 | 122.4 | -3.28 | -0.27 | 0.834 | 46.7% | +34 | — | +13 | 42.9% | -0.67 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.9 | +0.46 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1477 | 108.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1561 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 1475 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1840 | 138.3 | -0.20 | +0.40 | 0.943 | 48.8% | -46 | — | -30 | 45.9% | -0.19 | 4–3 (57%) | 8–8 (50%) | 103.7 | -1.92 |
| 28 | 2019 | 1481 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1916 | 147.9 | +1.33 | +2.10 | 1.114 | 51.4% | +45 | -348 | — | 50.8% | +0.49 | 2–6 (25%) | 5–11 (31%) | 93.6 | +0.12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1851 | 155.7 | +0.36 | -1.01 | 0.943 | 49.0% | +5 | -186 | -5 | 49.4% | -0.13 | 12–8 (60%) | 11–16 (41%) | 101.5 | -2.26 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1686 | 141.4 | -1.71 | -0.03 | 0.956 | 48.9% | -37 | +19 | +171 | 45.7% | -0.27 | 5–11 (31%) | 7–10 (41%) | 92.2 | +0.05 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1572 | 115.7 | -3.93 | -5.33 | 0.650 | 43.0% | +27 | +27 | +220 | 12.9% | -2.61 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1569 | 116.2 | -1.52 | +0.52 | 0.884 | 47.5% | +30 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1522 | 101.7 | -1.33 | +1.31 | 0.862 | 47.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.11 |
| Career | — | 1516 | 109.1 | -0.04 | -3.06 | 0.635 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +1.00 | — | 2007 | 139.5 | -1.26 | -0.72 | 0.912 | 48.3% | +4 | -113 | +63 | 42.8% | -0.48 | 49–59 (45%) | 64–79 (45%) | 96.9 | -1.68 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florent Serra | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 13, 2008 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Isner | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 26, 2020 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 15, 2018 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 15, 2018 | H2H |
| Leonardo Mayer | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 25, 2018 | H2H |
| Fernando Verdasco | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 15, 2017 | H2H |