H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Van Winitsky vs Brian Fairlie H2H: 1-1
Van Winitsky and Brian Fairlie are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on clay, while Brian Fairlie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Brian Fairlie won the 1978 Birmingham second round 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1978* | Birmingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Brian Fairlie | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1977* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Van Winitsky | 7-5 2-1 (ret.) | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Brian Fairlie | #332 | #24 | 0 | 1,916 | 233 | 220 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Van Winitsky | Brian Fairlie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 20–29 | 40.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 13–27 | 32.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #58 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #66 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #36 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #92 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #332 | 1,607 | 0 | 3 |