H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Van Winitsky vs Ilie Nastase H2H: 1-2
Ilie Nastase holds a 2–1 lead over Van Winitsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Ilie Nastase leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1982 Los Angeles-2 Wct third round 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1982* | Los Angeles-2 Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Van Winitsky | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1979* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Ilie Nastase | 6-4 6-4 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1978* | Miami | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Ilie Nastase | 6-3 6-3 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ilie Nastase | #1,075 | #1 | 0 | 2,260 | 859 | 331 | 72.2% | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 55 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Van Winitsky | Ilie Nastase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–14 | 74.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 60–20 | 75.0% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 73–13 | 84.9% | — | 2,079 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 106–20 | 84.1% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 |
| 26 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 118–17 | 87.4% | #1 | 2,208 | 2 | 41 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 80–21 | 79.2% | #10 | 2,153 | 2 | 48 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 91–21 | 81.2% | #7 | 2,170 | 2 | 54 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 76–17 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,179 | 2 | 59 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,092 | 2 | 62 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #16 | 2,059 | 2 | 64 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #49 | 1,795 | 2 | 64 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #77 | 1,740 | 2 | 64 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #74 | 1,730 | 2 | 64 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,633 | 2 | 64 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #118 | 1,595 | 2 | 64 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,574 | 2 | 64 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #431 | 1,535 | 2 | 64 |