H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Vasek Pospisil vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Vasek Pospisil holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vasek Pospisil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vasek Pospisil won the 2013 Bogota third round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2013* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Vasek Pospisil | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2012 | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | Q2 | Grass | Vasek Pospisil | 6-2 6-2 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vasek Pospisil | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |