H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Viktor Troicki vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 3-1

Viktor Troicki holds a 3–1 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2015 Bucharest third round 5-7 6-3 6-1.

SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 2015* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #68 5-7 6-3 6-1 Viktor Troicki #34 Match data
May 30, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Viktor Troicki #57 4-6 7-6(4) 6-0 6-7(7) 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #49 Match data
Jan 6, 2010* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Viktor Troicki #29 6-1 7-5 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #72 Match data
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Viktor Troicki #31 6-7(5) 6-0 1-6 6-3 7-5 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Viktor Troicki Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,640 0 0
24 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,732 0 0
25 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0
29 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,609 0 0
30 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,684 0 0
31 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,630 0 0
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,611 0 0
33 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3
34 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3
35 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3