H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Viktor Troicki vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 3-1

Viktor Troicki holds a 3–1 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2015 Tiriac Open round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #68 5-7 6-3 6-1 Viktor Troicki #34 Match data Apr 23, 2015* R32 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay
Viktor Troicki #57 4-6 7-6(4) 6-0 6-7(7) 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #49 Match data May 30, 2013* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Viktor Troicki #29 6-1 7-5 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #72 Match data Jan 6, 2010* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Viktor Troicki #31 6-7(5) 6-0 1-6 6-3 7-5 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #98 Match data Jun 25, 2009* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Viktor Troicki Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Viktor Troicki Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Viktor Troicki Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Viktor Troicki Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.41 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.24 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.68 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.82 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.30 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.52 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.04 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) — +0.26 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) — -1.56 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.36 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.39 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.