H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Viktor Troicki vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1

Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2013 Qatar Open second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Lacko #51 6-3 7-5 Viktor Troicki #38 Match data Jan 3, 2013* R16 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.41 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.24 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.68 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.82 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.30 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.52 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.04 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) — +0.26 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) — -1.56 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.36 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.39 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.