H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Vincent Spadea vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 1-3
Adrian Voinea holds a 3–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Adrian Voinea leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2002 Roland Garros second round 6-4 4-6 2-6 7-6(4) 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 6-4 4-6 2-6 7-6(4) 8-6 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Adrian Voinea | 7-6(1) 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2000* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Adrian Voinea | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1994* | Montevideo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Adrian Voinea | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Adrian Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vincent Spadea | Adrian Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |