H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Vincent Spadea vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-0

Vincent Spadea holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2004 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-4.

USA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
CAN Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vincent Spadea #21 6-1 6-4 Frank Dancevic #225 Match data Jul 28, 2004* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 311 350 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vincent Spadea Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,482 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,753 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2000 3–24 11.1% #213 1,540 0 0 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,530 0 0 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,622 0 0 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2004 40–26 60.6% #20 1,783 0 1 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,626 0 1 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,651 0 1 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0
33 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,643 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,520 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,475 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vincent Spadea Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1996 15 12 27 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 19 17 36 52.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 1999 17 12 29 58.6% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2000 1 15 16 6.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2001 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2002 8 9 17 47.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2003 24 16 40 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 24 14 38 63.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2005 14 17 31 45.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2007 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 198 204 402 49.3% 68 84 152 44.7% 27 39 66 40.9% 18 23 41 43.9% — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 604/661 of Vincent Spadea's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vincent Spadea Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 1993 6/6 2.3 4.2 49.5% 57.8% 42.6% 48.9% 47.3% 50.5% 38.6% 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 1994 19/24 2.0 2.0 56.3% 62.6% 45.0% 52.7% 37.8% 54.8% 40.6% 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 1995 43/49 3.1 1.7 57.3% 68.2% 51.1% 58.8% 44.4% 60.9% 40.7% 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 1996 42/49 3.5 1.3 61.8% 69.3% 54.4% 59.2% 44.6% 63.6% 41.2% 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 1997 38/46 3.9 2.5 55.0% 67.1% 50.9% 57.4% 48.6% 59.6% 38.0% 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 1998 47/55 2.4 1.5 66.4% 64.1% 52.2% 56.4% 46.9% 60.1% 37.8% 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 1999 53/60 4.9 1.9 53.1% 71.7% 52.3% 53.3% 48.4% 62.4% 40.6% 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2000 22/27 3.9 4.1 51.9% 65.6% 46.4% 58.5% 42.0% 56.2% 34.0% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 2001 3/4 3.7 7.7 52.6% 68.1% 46.9% 61.0% 28.5% 58.0% 35.1% 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 2002 26/30 5.0 6.2 54.9% 69.5% 51.9% 52.0% 37.4% 61.3% 37.1% 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 2003 56/59 3.8 4.2 54.0% 69.3% 51.6% 56.1% 54.1% 61.2% 39.7% 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2004 64/66 4.2 2.5 59.3% 69.0% 53.8% 61.4% 42.9% 62.6% 39.2% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 2005 45/45 3.1 3.4 56.4% 68.4% 49.1% 54.2% 46.3% 60.0% 39.3% 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 2006 45/45 3.3 2.9 57.7% 69.1% 50.3% 58.0% 38.6% 61.2% 40.8% 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 2007 52/52 3.0 2.1 61.9% 66.0% 53.2% 56.9% 45.7% 61.2% 37.3% 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
33 2008 31/32 3.7 3.0 58.1% 69.1% 49.9% 56.1% 45.4% 61.0% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 11/11 4.6 4.5 55.0% 66.0% 46.7% 50.5% 30.8% 56.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1/1 5.0 6.0 57.7% 63.3% 36.4% 20.0% — 51.9% 19.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 604/661 3.6 2.8 57.6% 68.0% 51.2% 56.6% 44.9% 60.7% 38.8% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vincent Spadea Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 1993 1483 111.6 -2.02 +0.71 0.780 44.9% +25 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.51 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 1994 1562 128.2 -4.35 +0.98 0.897 47.7% -7 -11 — 49.1% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 +0.31 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 1995 1640 140.5 -0.53 +2.71 1.040 50.5% +51 -56 -95 46.2% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 96.6 -1.18 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 1996 1712 143.3 +1.24 +2.99 1.130 52.3% +32 -80 -144 55.5% +0.52 3–10 (23%) 12–13 (48%) 94.0 -0.21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 97.3 +0.23
22 1997 1695 132.3 -1.99 +0.58 0.942 49.0% +54 -90 -177 44.2% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 8–13 (38%) 96.7 +0.15 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 102.4 -0.87
23 1998 1754 142.9 -1.19 +1.36 0.948 49.0% +12 -114 -242 48.9% -0.21 11–9 (55%) 11–7 (61%) 103.5 -1.59 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 96.2 +0.19
24 1999 1764 147.3 +0.64 +3.01 1.078 51.4% 0 +23 — 52.6% +0.40 11–8 (58%) 12–17 (41%) 96.0 -2.07 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 -0.65
25 2000 1541 116.0 -3.77 -2.37 0.776 45.7% +4 +136 -111 25.7% -1.37 2–10 (17%) 1–5 (17%) 87.4 -1.41 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2001 1530 100.5 -1.18 -1.97 0.837 46.8% +9 — — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 — — -0.11 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 +0.72
27 2002 1623 124.7 -0.85 -0.17 0.959 49.0% -26 +7 -149 44.3% -0.30 5–3 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 102.9 +0.52 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2003 1724 136.8 -0.66 +1.93 1.022 50.6% +8 -47 — 51.0% +0.20 14–4 (78%) 3–11 (21%) 102.0 +3.85 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.09
29 2004 1783 145.9 -0.01 +2.69 1.050 51.0% +7 -99 -180 57.4% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 10–14 (42%) 106.3 +0.56 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 +0.12
30 2005 1666 133.6 -2.19 +2.07 0.982 49.7% -7 +10 +9 49.5% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.6 +1.81 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 2006 1627 135.4 -0.44 +2.72 1.054 51.1% +39 -19 -31 42.6% -0.10 6–10 (38%) 4–13 (24%) 89.2 +0.49 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 +0.11
32 2007 1651 138.5 -1.80 +0.82 0.961 49.3% +13 -57 -80 44.9% -0.17 10–5 (67%) 10–9 (53%) 105.5 -2.61 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 2008 1644 128.2 -2.08 -1.45 0.903 48.3% +10 -100 +32 42.9% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 5–8 (38%) 99.5 +0.90 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1521 107.0 -4.53 -2.50 0.746 44.4% +14 — +119 19.2% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — +0.54 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1475 95.4 -1.09 -2.14 0.406 37.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1877 141.6 -1.05 +1.51 0.987 49.8% +15 -37 -86 47.2% -0.06 108–104 (51%) 98–134 (42%) 95.1 -0.06 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.