H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Wayne Arthurs vs Martin Lee H2H: 0-1
Martin Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Lee leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martin Lee won the 2002 Newport third round 3-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2002* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Martin Lee | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martin Lee | #1,474 | #94 | 429 | 1,594 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Arthurs | Martin Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #334 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #105 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #203 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #304 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |