H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs David Wheaton H2H: 1-1

Wayne Ferreira and David Wheaton are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on grass, while Wayne Ferreira leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1992 Australian Open fourth round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-2.

RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 22, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Wayne Ferreira #46 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-2 David Wheaton #15 Match data
Jun 13, 1990* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass David Wheaton #39 6-1 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #178 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,984 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira David Wheaton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,494 0 0
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,873 0 1
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,955 0 2
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,804 0 2
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,782 0 3
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,704 0 3
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,620 0 3
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,582 0 3
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,562 0 3
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15