H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs David Wheaton H2H: 1-1
Wayne Ferreira and David Wheaton are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on grass, while Wayne Ferreira leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1992 Australian Open fourth round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 6-2 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1990* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | David Wheaton | 6-1 6-4 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |