H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Wayne Odesnik vs Blaz Kavcic H2H: 2-0
Wayne Odesnik holds a 2–0 lead over Blaz Kavcic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Odesnik leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Odesnik won the 2012 Umag fourth round 3-6 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2012* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Wayne Odesnik | 3-6 7-5 7-6(3) | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Wayne Odesnik | 4-6 6-1 6-4 6-2 | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Odesnik | #267 | #77 | 984 | 1,729 | 40 | 59 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blaz Kavcic | #1,195 | #68 | 685 | 1,810 | 40 | 79 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Odesnik | Blaz Kavcic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #285 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #119 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #112 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #813 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #92 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #94 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #105 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #151 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #206 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |