H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Yahiya Doumbia vs Eduardo Masso H2H: 1-0

Yahiya Doumbia holds a 1–0 lead over Eduardo Masso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yahiya Doumbia leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yahiya Doumbia won the 1988 Montpellier Open semifinal 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yahiya Doumbia
SEN Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Eduardo Masso
BEL Age 62 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yahiya Doumbia #453 6-4 7-6 Eduardo Masso #186 Match data Feb 13, 1988* SF Montpellier Open ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yahiya Doumbia #1,312 #74 343 1,627 22 31 41.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Eduardo Masso #1,177 #56 568 1,685 41 69 37.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yahiya Doumbia Eduardo Masso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 — — — — — — — 1986 0–4 0.0% #208 1,457 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #185 1,472 0 0
24 1988 16–15 51.6% #83 1,611 0 1 1988 13–14 48.1% #87 1,602 0 0
25 1989 0–11 0.0% #389 1,486 0 1 1989 4–10 28.6% #305 1,566 0 0
26 1990 0–1 0.0% #540 1,483 0 1 1990 5–6 45.5% #125 1,593 0 0
27 1991 0–2 0.0% #230 1,455 0 1 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,619 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1992 3–14 17.6% #219 1,519 0 0
29 1993 1–1 50.0% #397 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1995 5–0 100.0% #142 1,580 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 0–1 0.0% #429 1,559 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yahiya Doumbia Eduardo Masso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1989 0 8 8 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 10 10 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 15 30 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — 11 17 28 39.3% 18 32 50 36.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 16 25 36.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 10/10 of Yahiya Doumbia's and 44/51 of Eduardo Masso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yahiya Doumbia Eduardo Masso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 2/2 7.0 2.5 54.4% 68.7% 56.0% 43.3% 36.1% 63.2% 33.9% 1991 28/34 0.6 2.6 67.3% 58.1% 47.4% 48.3% 47.5% 54.2% 40.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 16/17 1.1 1.5 76.6% 56.9% 44.8% 47.8% 41.6% 54.1% 39.4%
29 1993 2/2 5.0 7.0 50.3% 76.5% 53.9% 73.8% 33.3% 65.4% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5/5 3.8 1.0 60.5% 72.2% 53.7% 75.0% 58.9% 64.7% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1/1 1.0 8.0 45.0% 63.0% 33.3% 50.0% 23.1% 46.7% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10/53 4.4 3.2 55.7% 71.4% 52.2% 65.9% 45.6% 62.7% 41.3% — 44/110 0.8 2.2 70.7% 57.7% 46.5% 48.1% 45.4% 54.1% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yahiya Doumbia Eduardo Masso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1458 101.2 — — — — — +37 — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.24
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1472 114.7 — — — — +65 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.13
24 1988 1611 132.2 — — — — +75 -127 — 50.0% +0.08 6–5 (55%) 6–7 (46%) 103.2 +1.42 1988 1603 127.2 — — — — -10 -71 -28 44.1% -0.81 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 105.0 -0.57
25 1989 1487 104.0 — — — — +41 — — 11.1% -2.44 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.53 1989 1567 106.0 — — — — -3 -69 — 31.4% -1.89 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 +0.01
26 1990 1484 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.18 1990 1594 127.8 — — — — -26 -11 — 48.0% -0.32 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.6 -0.54
27 1991 1456 98.2 -1.37 -1.98 0.922 48.2% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–1 — +0.15 1991 1619 127.8 -3.84 +1.27 0.882 47.4% -71 +55 — 41.3% -0.61 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 98.1 -0.97
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1519 114.2 -3.66 -0.40 0.858 46.8% +31 +9 — 27.3% -1.34 1–3 (25%) 1–8 (11%) 93.9 +0.07
29 1993 1473 108.7 -0.76 +0.86 1.027 51.3% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1580 121.7 -0.73 +3.00 1.323 56.0% +30 — — 100.0% +3.10 — — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1559 97.8 -0.20 -0.05 0.750 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1628 125.9 -0.81 +1.27 1.107 52.2% +61 -127 — 43.8% -0.31 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) 97.2 +3.15 — 1685 127.2 -3.77 +0.66 0.873 47.2% -19 +7 -28 37.7% -1.01 18–17 (51%) 16–23 (41%) 101.4 -1.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.