H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Yann Marti vs Tomas Zib

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Yann Marti vs Tomas Zib.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yann Marti
SUI Age 38 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Zib #447 6-0 6-3 Yann Marti #663 Match data Jul 26, 2009 Q1 Q Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yann Marti #1,802 #200 248 1,591 2 5 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yann Marti Tomas Zib
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #589 1,483 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 2011 0–1 0.0% #596 1,520 0 0 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0
26 2014 2–2 50.0% #270 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 2016 0–1 0.0% #332 1,531 0 0 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yann Marti Tomas Zib
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 7/7 of Yann Marti's and 123/134 of Tomas Zib's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yann Marti Tomas Zib
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 40.7% 65.7% 45.1% 50.0% 75.0% 53.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 56.4% 74.2% 37.5% 57.1% 0.0% 58.2% 24.0% 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8%
26 2014 4/4 2.0 4.3 53.8% 61.0% 47.7% 61.5% 67.2% 54.5% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5%
28 2016 1/1 0.0 6.0 63.0% 58.8% 45.0% 61.1% 66.7% 53.7% 38.7% 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3%
Career — 7/7 1.7 4.9 53.6% 63.2% 45.5% 59.2% 58.7% 54.8% 37.4% — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yann Marti Tomas Zib
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1486 102.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1472 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1459 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1484 103.4 -0.31 +0.03 0.774 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.22 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05
23 2011 1520 101.9 -3.33 -2.89 0.574 41.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.05 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.15
24 2012 1473 94.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.93
25 2013 1473 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84
26 2014 1545 114.0 -1.55 -1.15 0.897 48.0% — +111 — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.01 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1532 104.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14
28 2016 1531 99.3 -1.22 -0.25 0.836 46.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.26 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
29 2017 1514 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.40
30 2018 1529 102.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1591 106.1 -1.58 -1.10 0.827 46.6% — +111 — 35.3% -1.24 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 +6.29 — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.