H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yannick Hanfmann vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 0-1
Henri Laaksonen holds a 1–0 lead over Yannick Hanfmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Laaksonen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2021 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2021 | Antwerp | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 0-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Yannick Hanfmann | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Yannick Hanfmann | Match data |
| Jul 7, 2014 | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Yannick Hanfmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |