H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Yannick Hanfmann holds a 1–0 lead over Vilius Gaubas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Hanfmann leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Hanfmann won the 2026 Chile Open quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Vilius Gaubas | Match data | Feb 27, 2026 | QF | Chile Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | #54 | #45 | 1,011 | 1,863 | 103 | 110 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vilius Gaubas | #121 | #101 | 603 | 1,657 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Vilius Gaubas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #130 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Vilius Gaubas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2010 | 1484 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1525 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1574 | 115.9 | -0.21 | +0.72 | 0.878 | 48.0% | — | +67 | — | 57.1% | -0.57 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1611 | 111.4 | -2.95 | -0.87 | 0.849 | 47.1% | — | +1 | — | 33.3% | -0.73 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.41 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1495 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 1513 | 110.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 1647 | 121.1 | -0.48 | -1.09 | 0.932 | 48.9% | — | +79 | — | 50.0% | +0.18 | 6–0 (100%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 1588 | 112.5 | +0.09 | +0.05 | 0.971 | 49.4% | — | +117 | — | 35.0% | -0.70 | 0–4 (0%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 1609 | 124.5 | +2.00 | +2.13 | 0.639 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 1721 | 133.0 | +1.38 | +1.59 | 1.157 | 52.6% | — | +92 | — | 63.6% | +1.09 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 1667 | 127.0 | -1.66 | -0.89 | 0.910 | 48.3% | -160 | +160 | -73 | 42.3% | -0.75 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 1635 | 118.7 | -0.91 | -0.55 | 0.983 | 49.4% | -74 | +133 | — | 46.7% | -0.07 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–4 (0%) | — | +1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 1727 | 140.9 | -0.21 | +2.41 | 1.044 | 50.4% | -124 | +128 | -97 | 46.4% | -0.09 | 11–7 (61%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | -0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 1630 | 129.0 | -2.20 | -0.67 | 0.912 | 48.2% | -42 | +145 | -23 | 42.1% | -0.52 | 10–3 (77%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 1769 | 133.1 | +0.79 | -0.20 | 0.955 | 49.1% | -44 | -38 | — | 42.4% | -0.27 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–7 (22%) | — | -1.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 1761 | 138.4 | +2.55 | -0.74 | 1.071 | 50.5% | -29 | +33 | -79 | 52.0% | +0.11 | 6–4 (60%) | 18–12 (60%) | — | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1864 | 136.2 | -0.06 | +0.14 | 0.988 | 49.5% | -76 | +97 | -74 | 45.9% | -0.20 | 46–25 (65%) | 42–59 (42%) | 107.3 | -1.23 | — | 1657 | 114.5 | -2.40 | -0.55 | 0.855 | 47.3% | — | +15 | — | 37.8% | -0.70 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.4 | +2.53 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Cerundolo | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Luciano Darderi | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Pedro Martinez | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jul 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Lorenzo Musetti | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 17, 2025 | H2H |
| Arthur Rinderknech | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 25, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian Baez | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Pablo Carreno Busta | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Jesper de Jong | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 13, 2026 | H2H |
| Kyrian Jacquet | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Luca Van Assche | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |