H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Yannick Noah vs Andrew Pattison H2H: 1-0

Yannick Noah holds a 1–0 lead over Andrew Pattison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1982 Indian Wells Open round of 64 7-5 6-3.

FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 77 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yannick Noah #17 7-5 6-3 Andrew Pattison Match data Feb 17, 1982* R64 Indian Wells Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23
Andrew Pattison — — — 1,979 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yannick Noah Andrew Pattison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,889 0 5 — — — — — — —
21 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
22 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11 — — — — — — —
23 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14 — — — — — — —
24 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14 — — — — — — —
25 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17 — — — — — — —
26 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19 — — — — — — —
27 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21 — — — — — — —
28 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22 — — — — — — —
29 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22 — — — — — — —
30 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
31 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
35 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23 — — — — — — —
36 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yannick Noah Andrew Pattison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1968 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1969 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8% 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1972 6 6 12 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8%
24 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1973 10 7 17 58.8% 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5%
25 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1974 14 4 18 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 0 2 100.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — 11 6 17 64.7% 1975 8 6 14 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7%
28 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 9 2 11 81.8% 1977 11 9 20 55.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
29 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1978 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
30 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1979 13 7 20 65.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
31 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2% — 96 79 175 54.9% 63 60 123 51.2% 30 28 58 51.7% 67 70 137 48.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yannick Noah Andrew Pattison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1977 1491 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1709 137.9 — — — — -111 +56 -174 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) 105.7 +3.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1933 150.7 — — — — -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 105.8 +0.67 1968 1450 97.3 — — — — -2 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
20 1980 1890 153.0 — — — — +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 97.9 -3.05 1969 1473 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.07
21 1981 1917 156.5 — — — — +62 +117 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) 104.8 -1.67 1970 1495 118.9 — — — — +83 +22 -13 35.2% -0.83 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
22 1982 2086 164.7 — — — — -20 +30 — 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) 104.2 -3.56 1971 1586 125.5 — — — — +32 — -50 49.0% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.46
23 1983 2087 162.3 — — — — -135 +184 — 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 98.9 -1.85 1972 1840 143.0 — — — — -75 -3 -227 62.3% +0.95 9–5 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 109.4 +0.20
24 1984 1998 159.6 — — — — -11 +206 — 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) 100.8 -2.14 1973 1772 131.9 — — — — -44 +3 -85 48.5% -0.10 8–7 (53%) 7–11 (39%) 100.0 -2.69
25 1985 1957 156.2 — — — — -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) 100.2 -0.87 1974 1923 152.3 — — — — -14 -57 — 66.0% +1.30 8–3 (73%) 4–1 (80%) 109.2 -1.00
26 1986 2013 163.9 — — — — -41 +208 — 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) 99.8 -2.21 1975 1934 141.1 — — — — -77 -16 -175 54.2% +0.23 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 99.9 -1.91
27 1987 1951 147.7 — — — — +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) 99.7 +1.55 1976 1821 146.5 — — — — +15 — — 42.5% -0.37 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 103.6 -2.93
28 1988 1949 153.8 — — — — +75 +116 — 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) 99.1 -0.74 1977 1774 143.3 — — — — +32 +17 -27 51.1% +0.14 10–9 (53%) 14–6 (70%) 105.5 -2.22
29 1989 1877 147.3 — — — — +46 — — 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) 98.9 -0.89 1978 1708 135.0 — — — — +19 +74 — 47.2% +0.19 4–3 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 101.7 +1.01
30 1990 1708 139.1 — — — — +109 +162 — 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) 95.3 -1.00 1979 1777 133.3 — — — — +32 -64 -59 49.1% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 104.1 -0.12
31 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 — 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.03 1980 1732 146.9 — — — — +51 -26 +6 50.0% +0.07 4–3 (57%) 6–11 (35%) 97.6 -3.35
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1689 126.4 — — — — +45 -39 — 40.5% -0.60 4–2 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.5 +0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1622 121.6 — — — — +11 — — 36.1% -1.17 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1603 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25
35 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 1–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2199 161.1 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00 — 1979 145.1 — — — — +3 -7 -92 50.3% +0.11 78–59 (57%) 71–64 (53%) 108.6 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.