H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Harold Solomon H2H: 3-0
Yannick Noah holds a 3–0 lead over Harold Solomon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1986 Boca West second round 4-6 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1986* | Boca West | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yannick Noah | 4-6 6-0 6-1 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1984* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Yannick Noah | 6-3 6-4 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1979* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Yannick Noah | 6-0 6-7 6-1 1-6 6-4 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Harold Solomon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 |