H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Ilie Nastase H2H: 3-0
Yannick Noah holds a 3–0 lead over Ilie Nastase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yannick Noah leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1984 Toulouse third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1984* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yannick Noah | 6-3 6-3 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1984* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Yannick Noah | 7-5 6-4 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1981* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Yannick Noah | 2-6 7-6 7-5 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Ilie Nastase | #1,075 | #1 | 0 | 2,260 | 859 | 331 | 72.2% | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 55 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Ilie Nastase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 41–14 | 74.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1970 | 60–20 | 75.0% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1971 | 73–13 | 84.9% | — | 2,079 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1972 | 106–20 | 84.1% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1973 | 118–17 | 87.4% | #1 | 2,208 | 2 | 41 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1974 | 80–21 | 79.2% | #10 | 2,153 | 2 | 48 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1975 | 91–21 | 81.2% | #7 | 2,170 | 2 | 54 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1976 | 76–17 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,179 | 2 | 59 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | 1977 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,092 | 2 | 62 |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | 1978 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #16 | 2,059 | 2 | 64 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #49 | 1,795 | 2 | 64 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #77 | 1,740 | 2 | 64 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #74 | 1,730 | 2 | 64 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,633 | 2 | 64 |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | 1983 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #118 | 1,595 | 2 | 64 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,574 | 2 | 64 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #431 | 1,535 | 2 | 64 |