H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Yannick Noah vs Paul Kronk H2H: 1-0

Yannick Noah holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Kronk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1980 Stockholm Open round of 32 6-4 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yannick Noah
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Paul Kronk
AUS Age 71 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yannick Noah #20 6-4 2-6 6-1 Paul Kronk Match data Nov 7, 1980* R32 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23
Paul Kronk — — — 1,685 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yannick Noah Paul Kronk
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,889 0 5 — — — — — — —
21 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
22 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11 — — — — — — —
23 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14 — — — — — — —
24 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14 — — — — — — —
25 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17 — — — — — — —
26 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19 — — — — — — —
27 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21 — — — — — — —
28 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22 — — — — — — —
29 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22 — — — — — — —
30 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
31 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
35 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23 — — — — — — —
36 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yannick Noah Paul Kronk
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1973 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
19 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1974 1 8 9 11.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
20 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 10 15 25 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8% 1976 5 4 9 55.6% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 1 4 5 20.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1979 2 7 9 22.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1980 6 6 12 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — 11 6 17 64.7% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 3 9 12 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2% — 26 48 74 35.1% 38 71 109 34.9% 22 28 50 44.0% 6 19 25 24.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yannick Noah Paul Kronk
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1469 94.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.21
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1495 101.1 — — — — — — — 75.0% +1.25 — — — -0.03
17 1977 1491 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.08 1972 1466 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.37
18 1978 1709 137.9 — — — — -111 +56 -174 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) 105.7 +3.56 1973 1512 106.7 — — — — +61 +64 -83 35.9% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 103.8 -0.01
19 1979 1933 150.7 — — — — -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 105.8 +0.67 1974 1501 117.5 — — — — -46 +111 — 29.7% -1.69 4–5 (44%) 5–3 (63%) 103.5 +0.15
20 1980 1890 153.0 — — — — +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 97.9 -3.05 1975 1571 115.6 — — — — -110 +6 -89 43.0% -0.51 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) 94.5 +3.42
21 1981 1917 156.5 — — — — +62 +117 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) 104.8 -1.67 1976 1535 114.9 — — — — -28 -22 -60 38.7% -1.00 0–6 (0%) 5–5 (50%) 94.9 +2.43
22 1982 2086 164.7 — — — — -20 +30 — 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) 104.2 -3.56 1977 1543 116.8 — — — — -64 -31 -38 34.4% -1.22 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 +0.95
23 1983 2087 162.3 — — — — -135 +184 — 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 98.9 -1.85 1978 1622 127.1 — — — — -127 -92 +21 40.0% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 106.0 +0.89
24 1984 1998 159.6 — — — — -11 +206 — 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) 100.8 -2.14 1979 1578 118.9 — — — — -96 -80 +59 38.1% -0.89 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 100.0 +0.14
25 1985 1957 156.2 — — — — -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) 100.2 -0.87 1980 1633 122.9 — — — — -47 -105 — 46.9% -0.45 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 104.9 +1.08
26 1986 2013 163.9 — — — — -41 +208 — 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) 99.8 -2.21 1981 1640 118.8 — — — — -84 -155 +97 45.0% -0.36 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 101.0 +0.81
27 1987 1951 147.7 — — — — +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) 99.7 +1.55 1982 1600 102.6 — — — — — -117 — 25.0% -1.83 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.03
28 1988 1949 153.8 — — — — +75 +116 — 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) 99.1 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 1877 147.3 — — — — +46 — — 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) 98.9 -0.89 1984 1571 97.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — +0.16
30 1990 1708 139.1 — — — — +109 +162 — 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) 95.3 -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 — 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 1–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2199 161.1 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00 — 1685 121.5 — — — — -53 -33 +11 38.8% -0.90 30–41 (42%) 41–36 (53%) 103.5 +4.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.