H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 1-1
Yasutaka Uchiyama and Kyle Edmund are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2020 New York third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 7-5 6-4 | Yasutaka Uchiyama | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2019* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Yasutaka Uchiyama | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yasutaka Uchiyama | #336 | #78 | 735 | 1,664 | 11 | 25 | 30.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yasutaka Uchiyama | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #81 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #104 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #203 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #146 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |