H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Radu Albot H2H: 1-0
Yasutaka Uchiyama holds a 1–0 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yasutaka Uchiyama leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yasutaka Uchiyama won the 2019 Tokyo fourth round 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2019* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Yasutaka Uchiyama | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Dec 30, 2013 | Chennai | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Radu Albot | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Yasutaka Uchiyama | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yasutaka Uchiyama | #336 | #78 | 735 | 1,664 | 11 | 25 | 30.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yasutaka Uchiyama | Radu Albot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #81 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #104 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #203 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #146 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |