H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0
Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2013 US Open first round 6-4 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-4 7-6(5) 6-3 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |