H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Juan Monaco H2H: 1-2
Juan Monaco holds a 2–1 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2015 Auckland third round 6-4 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2015* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-4 2-6 6-1 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 5-0 (ret.) | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2005* | Ho Chi Minh City | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Juan Monaco | (w/o) | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Juan Monaco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |