H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-2
Lukas Lacko holds a 2–1 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lukas Lacko leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2014 Washington third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2014* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 6-1 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2012* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-3 7-6(3) | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2010* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 6-4 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Lukas Lacko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |