H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Milos Raonic H2H: 0-3
Milos Raonic holds a 3–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2016 Canada Masters third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-3 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2014* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Milos Raonic | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2011* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-3 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |