H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 0-1
Pablo Cuevas holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2009 Moscow third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2009* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pablo Cuevas | 6-4 6-2 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |