H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Yen-Hsun Lu vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 1-0

Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2012 Chennai round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yen-Hsun Lu
TPE Age 43 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yen-Hsun Lu #82 6-3 6-3 Thiemo de Bakker #223 Match data Jan 5, 2012* R32 Chennai ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yen-Hsun Lu #991 #33 1,244 1,856 145 228 38.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 2004 4–10 28.6% #87 1,455 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 2005 3–8 27.3% #158 1,529 0 0 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 2006 2–7 22.2% #89 1,489 0 0 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 2007 6–14 30.0% #110 1,500 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2008 9–14 39.1% #64 1,601 0 0 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2009 9–22 29.0% #98 1,587 0 0 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 2010 15–20 42.9% #35 1,708 0 0 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2011 11–20 35.5% #82 1,709 0 0 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2012 12–18 40.0% #59 1,737 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2013 17–18 48.6% #65 1,765 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2014 24–23 51.1% #38 1,795 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2015 16–22 42.1% #77 1,828 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2016 7–9 43.8% #64 1,801 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2017 9–14 39.1% #71 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2020 0–2 0.0% #1008 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–7 12.5% #568 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2005 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2006 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2009 8 16 24 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2010 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 13 14 27 48.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 20 17 37 54.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 170 282 39.7% 5 20 25 20.0% 27 37 64 42.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/373 of Yen-Hsun Lu's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 2004 13/14 4.2 3.8 60.4% 70.4% 50.3% 56.7% 29.5% 62.4% 32.7% 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 2005 10/11 5.6 4.3 58.4% 72.2% 46.4% 47.1% 48.4% 61.6% 35.8% 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 2006 8/9 3.9 2.9 61.6% 71.6% 51.5% 45.1% 56.4% 63.7% 33.7% 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 2007 20/20 4.0 4.1 59.5% 67.6% 46.0% 56.1% 33.4% 58.9% 34.4% 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2008 20/23 4.3 4.8 60.2% 69.2% 49.2% 59.3% 33.6% 61.2% 34.2% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2009 31/31 3.2 3.5 61.3% 67.3% 46.3% 53.9% 39.1% 59.1% 35.1% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2010 35/35 5.3 3.1 59.4% 70.3% 51.7% 57.9% 36.2% 62.7% 35.3% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2011 31/31 3.2 3.7 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 57.6% 43.8% 60.5% 33.7% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2012 29/30 4.5 3.8 60.4% 69.7% 50.4% 55.5% 40.3% 62.1% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 34/35 3.9 3.2 62.7% 70.1% 54.1% 54.1% 43.0% 64.0% 39.9% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2014 45/47 3.8 3.0 64.1% 71.7% 52.7% 64.1% 40.4% 64.8% 35.3% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2015 37/38 4.8 2.4 57.8% 70.8% 51.5% 52.9% 40.1% 62.8% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 15/16 6.3 3.5 59.8% 71.6% 52.3% 54.3% 38.4% 63.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 23/23 5.2 3.9 58.5% 73.0% 53.6% 54.8% 41.6% 65.1% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 62.8% 44.4% 54.5% 12.5% 54.6% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 7/8 2.1 3.0 65.1% 60.2% 45.7% 43.7% 53.6% 55.2% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 360/373 4.3 3.4 60.7% 69.9% 50.6% 56.0% 39.9% 62.2% 35.4% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 2002 1485 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 2003 1442 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 2004 1456 111.8 -0.90 -1.80 0.870 47.4% -24 — +127 32.4% -1.03 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 2005 1529 105.2 -1.75 -1.63 0.935 48.5% -92 — — 37.9% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.76 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) 101.3 +0.27
22 2006 1490 101.0 -1.09 -2.45 0.929 48.0% -60 — +138 23.8% -1.57 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.44 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 -0.54
23 2007 1501 120.4 -3.97 -1.15 0.837 46.6% -1 — — 31.8% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +0.38 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2008 1601 125.7 -1.79 -1.16 0.883 47.9% +17 — -89 47.4% -0.54 2–5 (29%) 10–2 (83%) 104.7 +0.73 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.5 -0.74
25 2009 1587 133.7 -2.87 -1.18 0.858 47.1% +17 -132 -72 36.8% -0.97 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.68 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.8 +0.61
26 2010 1708 134.3 -0.60 -0.59 0.948 48.8% -66 — 0 44.0% -0.57 4–4 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 105.4 +1.46 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 +0.19
27 2011 1710 133.3 -2.05 -2.16 0.853 47.4% -62 -270 +28 41.1% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 7–5 (58%) 99.2 -1.26 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.4 -0.71
28 2012 1738 140.5 -0.67 -1.75 0.905 48.3% +2 — -20 42.5% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 8–8 (50%) 100.3 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1765 147.8 +0.73 +1.97 1.108 51.5% -3 -266 -12 51.2% +0.26 3–8 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 95.1 +0.45 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2014 1795 150.6 +0.13 +0.10 1.003 50.0% +19 -310 -17 52.4% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +1.57 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2015 1828 152.3 -0.89 +0.91 0.976 49.4% +7 -314 -2 47.7% -0.12 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 98.3 -1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1801 147.0 +1.01 -0.51 0.941 49.3% -24 — — 47.5% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.9 -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1703 133.4 +0.54 +0.75 1.087 51.1% -1 — — 43.5% +0.03 2–5 (29%) 3–8 (27%) 92.8 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1674 106.0 -0.99 -1.90 0.714 43.3% — — — 16.7% -2.84 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1612 125.4 -3.24 -0.96 0.665 43.1% +37 — — 15.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1856 144.1 -0.96 -0.49 0.937 48.7% -10 -262 +8 42.8% -0.48 33–63 (34%) 77–73 (51%) 97.0 +0.38 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.