H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yoshihito Nishioka vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 1-0
Yoshihito Nishioka holds a 1–0 lead over Henri Laaksonen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yoshihito Nishioka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yoshihito Nishioka won the 2020 New York third round 6-3 0-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yoshihito Nishioka | 6-3 0-6 6-2 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| May 23, 2016 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Yoshihito Nishioka | 6-2 2-6 8-6 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshihito Nishioka | #177 | #24 | 1,351 | 1,931 | 131 | 160 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yoshihito Nishioka | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #166 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #75 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #73 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #56 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #36 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #69 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #110 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |