H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yoshihito Nishioka vs Marius Copil
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Yoshihito Nishioka vs Marius Copil.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshihito Nishioka | #177 | #24 | 1,351 | 1,931 | 131 | 160 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yoshihito Nishioka | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #166 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #75 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #73 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #56 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #36 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #69 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #110 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |