H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Younes El Aynaoui vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 2-0
Younes El Aynaoui holds a 2–0 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Younes El Aynaoui leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Younes El Aynaoui won the 1996 Jakarta quarterfinal 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1996* | Jakarta | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Younes El Aynaoui | 6-0 6-1 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1993* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Younes El Aynaoui | 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Younes El Aynaoui | Emilio Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |