H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Younes El Aynaoui vs Rik De Voest H2H: 1-0

Younes El Aynaoui holds a 1–0 lead over Rik De Voest in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Younes El Aynaoui leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Younes El Aynaoui won the 2003 Long Island round of 16 7-6(3) 3-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 55 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rik De Voest
RSA Age 46 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Younes El Aynaoui #22 7-6(3) 3-0 Rik De Voest #189 Match data Aug 22, 2003* R16 Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Rik De Voest #1,088 #110 538 1,692 19 38 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Rik De Voest
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0 2003 2–2 50.0% #241 1,468 0 0
24 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0 2004 3–2 60.0% #207 1,508 0 0
25 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0 2006 2–7 22.2% #135 1,451 0 0
27 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1 2007 3–4 42.9% #120 1,580 0 0
28 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1 2008 3–7 30.0% #159 1,651 0 0
29 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2 2009 1–5 16.7% #236 1,575 0 0
30 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5 2010 0–3 0.0% #181 1,630 0 0
31 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5 2011 5–4 55.6% #126 1,665 0 0
32 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5 2012 0–3 0.0% #258 1,604 0 0
33 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5 2013 0–1 0.0% #171 1,584 0 0
34 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Rik De Voest
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 2009 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2004 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0% — 16 30 46 34.8% — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 88/97 of Younes El Aynaoui's and 57/57 of Rik De Voest's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Rik De Voest
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/4 1.3 1.5 62.9% 73.6% 51.7% 55.0% 23.6% 64.6% 33.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/5 5.8 3.0 55.9% 68.2% 55.4% 63.4% 44.7% 62.5% 35.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/9 3.6 2.1 58.0% 67.0% 48.0% 61.8% 30.9% 59.1% 32.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 7/7 3.6 1.7 60.9% 72.4% 46.1% 57.3% 31.4% 61.7% 38.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 10/10 4.1 2.3 57.6% 68.1% 50.8% 51.5% 52.8% 60.5% 33.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 2.8 2.2 58.1% 68.1% 47.5% 57.5% 35.2% 58.5% 31.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/3 7.3 2.3 65.9% 66.2% 47.8% 50.1% 38.7% 59.8% 34.6%
31 2003 58/64 10.7 2.9 65.7% 75.4% 50.8% 67.6% 41.2% 66.9% 35.2% 2011 9/9 4.1 1.2 61.1% 69.8% 47.8% 64.8% 37.8% 61.1% 35.3%
32 2004 4/5 1.0 3.3 64.2% 48.9% 32.0% 46.9% 0.0% 42.4% 21.1% 2012 3/3 5.0 0.0 66.2% 65.9% 45.3% 53.3% 30.2% 59.3% 32.6%
33 2005 11/11 2.4 3.5 61.8% 60.7% 40.1% 48.9% 25.2% 52.9% 31.7% 2013 1/1 3.0 1.0 68.9% 56.9% 47.8% 63.6% 33.3% 54.1% 33.3%
34 2006 3/4 5.7 2.0 56.4% 78.3% 53.6% 57.8% 33.0% 67.0% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 4/4 5.0 1.8 67.9% 69.5% 44.5% 53.4% 35.1% 62.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 6/7 9.5 2.7 64.0% 77.9% 48.6% 64.3% 58.3% 67.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 2/2 8.0 3.0 59.3% 78.4% 40.6% 58.3% 12.5% 62.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 88/465 8.6 2.9 64.7% 72.4% 48.0% 62.9% 37.3% 63.8% 34.1% — 57/57 4.0 1.9 60.0% 68.7% 48.9% 58.1% 37.5% 60.6% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Rik De Voest
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1492 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1532 116.8 — — — — — +42 — 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 1637 136.8 — — — — -93 +76 — 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 1517 125.5 — — — — +44 +45 — 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 +1.14 2002 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 1562 110.8 — — — — -30 +67 — 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.06 2003 1469 105.2 -0.66 +1.23 0.958 48.7% — — — 50.0% +0.13 — 0–1 — +0.08
24 1996 1569 135.0 — — — — +36 +10 — 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 103.7 -0.66 2004 1509 105.1 -0.63 -0.05 0.950 49.7% +36 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 1–0 — +0.28
25 1997 1582 114.0 — — — — — +36 — 50.0% -0.25 — 2–0 — +0.10 2005 1504 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 1664 129.0 — — — — — +55 — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 — -0.43 2006 1451 112.9 -1.37 -2.43 0.791 46.3% +35 — — 30.0% -1.15 0–2 0–1 — +0.04
27 1999 1721 149.4 — — — — -67 +83 — 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 -2.15 2007 1581 111.0 -1.61 +1.14 1.003 50.2% -3 — — 28.6% -1.43 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.13
28 2000 1717 137.4 — — — — -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) 103.5 +1.57 2008 1651 120.0 -2.23 -1.52 0.834 47.1% +18 — — 30.4% -1.22 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.47
29 2001 1823 138.8 — — — — -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 105.8 -0.38 2009 1576 109.5 -3.14 -1.79 0.761 46.0% +30 — — 23.1% -1.23 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.41
30 2002 1774 143.3 — — — — -28 +122 — 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) 102.1 -0.43 2010 1630 119.7 -1.54 -0.67 0.860 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.92 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.05
31 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) 101.2 +1.73 2011 1665 118.2 -0.48 -1.65 0.907 49.0% -23 — — 47.6% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.95
32 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 — — 0.0% -4.17 — — — -0.47 2012 1605 111.1 -0.91 -1.40 0.802 46.5% +28 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–2 0–1 — +0.13
33 2005 1592 108.9 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 — 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.39 2013 1585 113.2 -2.33 -1.71 0.725 44.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13
34 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.20 2014 1558 101.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% — +102 — 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59 — 1692 117.2 -1.48 -1.02 0.865 47.8% +15 — — 35.1% -0.88 4–9 (31%) 8–14 (36%) 91.9 +4.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.