H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Zeljko Franulovic vs Tom Edlefsen H2H: 4-0
Zeljko Franulovic holds a 4–0 lead over Tom Edlefsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zeljko Franulovic leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Zeljko Franulovic won the 1969 Houston quarterfinal 0-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 84
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1969* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 0-6 6-2 6-4 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1969* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Zeljko Franulovic | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1969* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 11-9 6-4 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1968* | Senigallia | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 6-2 6-4 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeljko Franulovic | #616 | #30 | 0 | 2,014 | 407 | 307 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Tom Edlefsen | #172 | #94 | 0 | 1,734 | 109 | 147 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zeljko Franulovic | Tom Edlefsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 64–29 | 68.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 59–28 | 67.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,706 | 0 | 11 | 1968 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #77 | 1,657 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 26–25 | 51.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,747 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #44 | 1,916 | 0 | 12 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1977 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 13 | 1972 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1978 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 13 | 1973 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #111 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1979 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,768 | 0 | 13 | 1974 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #118 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1980 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,678 | 0 | 13 | 1975 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,616 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1983 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,567 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |