H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Zhizhen Zhang vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 0-1
Andreas Seppi holds a 1–0 lead over Zhizhen Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2019 Zhuhai fourth round 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019* | Zhuhai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(8) | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zhizhen Zhang | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |