H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Zhizhen Zhang vs Andy Murray H2H: 0-1
Andy Murray holds a 1–0 lead over Zhizhen Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andy Murray leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Murray won the 2018 Shenzhen third round 6-3 6-7(3) 4-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2018* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-3 6-7(3) 4-2 (ret.) | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andy Murray | #160 | #1 | 12,685 | 2,470 | 703 | 264 | 72.7% | 3 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zhizhen Zhang | Andy Murray | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #64 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #17 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 40–14 | 74.1% | #11 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,194 | 0 | 8 |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #4 | 2,211 | 0 | 14 |
| 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,134 | 0 | 16 |
| 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 21 |
| 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 1 | 23 |
| 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #4 | 2,263 | 2 | 27 |
| 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,227 | 2 | 30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,288 | 2 | 34 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 71–8 | 89.9% | #1 | 2,464 | 3 | 42 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26–10 | 72.2% | #16 | 2,223 | 3 | 43 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #240 | 2,083 | 3 | 43 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #125 | 2,014 | 3 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,953 | 3 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #134 | 1,897 | 3 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #49 | 1,865 | 3 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,780 | 3 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,707 | 3 | 44 |