H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Zhizhen Zhang vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 0-1
Federico Delbonis holds a 1–0 lead over Zhizhen Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Federico Delbonis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2021 Hamburg third round 6-1 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2021* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Federico Delbonis | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zhizhen Zhang | Federico Delbonis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |