H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Zhizhen Zhang vs Go Soeda H2H: 1-0
Zhizhen Zhang holds a 1–0 lead over Go Soeda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zhizhen Zhang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zhizhen Zhang won the 2015 Shenzhen third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 41
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2015* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Zhizhen Zhang | 6-4 6-4 | Go Soeda | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Go Soeda | #683 | #47 | 888 | 1,722 | 29 | 76 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zhizhen Zhang | Go Soeda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #120 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |